Monday, April 24, 2006

57249

this number attained great significance this weekend, for I
- saw 'RHTDM' for the 57249th * 57249th time
- saw 'Maine Pyaar Kiya' for the 57249th time
- resolved for the 57249th time, that this week onwards will resume gymming (1)
- resolved to reduce 5.2749 cms of my girth
- For the 57249th time, wondered about the reason for the being of mankind... (2)

(1) - On all the previous occasions I have broken my resolution
(2) - Was it the outcome of a depression? may not be so - coz i dont remember feeling low

Comments on "57249"

 

Blogger Perestroika said ... (3:54 PM) : 

man u must be liking diya mirza a lot to see rhtdm tht many times.

probably me too must have watched mpk tht many times, as a kid i had its video casette.

n i guess we already had the discussion abt the existence thing.

 

Blogger Anirudh said ... (4:56 AM) : 

why even bother to count the no.of times u watch a movie.....if i do that, the limitations of maths will b evident pretty soon! :D

 

Blogger Zaki M said ... (6:09 AM) : 

@pratik - i have absolutely no liking or any such thing that resembles liking towards diya (or is it dia?)
- i myself have wondered what is it that makes me want to watch this movie everytime it is played (much to the anger of my mom who comments 'firse dekh raha hai wo madraasi ki film')
- that does happen to me for a number of other films - the reasons of which are more difficult to comprehend

@rao - u think i counted 57259 ;)

 

Blogger #@R$#@D said ... (2:43 PM) : 

I wonder what is significance of 57249... Any special number?

 

Blogger Zaki M said ... (6:56 PM) : 

@harshad - randomness is always special & a proof that its nt just ppl in infy who do such things ;)

@pratik - i happened to search 57249 after the above comment and found it to be the zipcode of South Dakota (i knw u r in ND)

 

Blogger Perestroika said ... (11:16 AM) : 

had u selected 58203, u could have been right on target!!!

come to think of it, isnt 58203 better sounding than 57249(whch sounds like a phone no.)

;)

 

Blogger Zaki M said ... (12:19 AM) : 

i agree... 57249 does sound like a part of a number - shld think more of the reason though ;) (US numbers are smaller) :)

 

post a comment